Download hoax harvest moon back to nature pc. Harvest Moon Back To Nature
Looking for:
Download hoax harvest moon back to nature pc |
Full text of "Wagging the Moondoggy Mcgowan moon apollo hoax nwo illuminati freemasons".
Resep Masakan Di Harvest Moon Friends Of Mineral Town - Dimas_Harvest
Search the history of over billion web pages on the Internet. Capture a web page nqture it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future. Uploaded by DuangAesthetic3 on February 26, Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass. Download hoax harvest moon back to nature pc icon An illustration of a person's head and chest.
Sign up Log in. Web icon An illustration of a computer application window Wayback Machine Texts icon An illustration of an open book. Books Video icon An illustration of two cells of a film strip. Video Audio icon An illustration of an audio speaker. Mono Software icon An illustration of a 3. Software Images icon An illustration of two photographs. Images Donate icon An /12500.php of a heart shape Donate Ellipses icon An illustration of text ellipses.
Metropolitan Museum Cleveland Museum of Art. Internet Arcade Console Living Room. Books to Downlpad Open Library. Search the Download hoax harvest moon back to nature pc Machine Search icon An illustration of a magnifying glass.
Sign up for free Log in. EMBED for wordpress. Want more? Advanced embedding details, examples, and help! For play in epsxe emulator PC or Android and sony playstation video game console system. There are no reviews yet. Be yo first one to write a review. The Vintage Software Collection.
Death spiral for cars. By , you probably won’t own one | RenewEconomy.
What primarily motivates them is fear. But it is not the lie itself that scares people; it is what that lie says about the world around us and how it really functions. For if NASA was able to pull off such an outrageous hoax before the entire world, and then keep that lie in place for four decades, what does that say about the control of the information we receive?
What does that say about the media, and the scientific community, and the educational community, and all the other institutions we depend on to tell us the truth? What does that say about the very nature of the world we live in? That is what scares the hell out of people and prevents them from even considering the possibility that they could have been so thoroughly duped.
It has been my experience that the vast majority of the people who truly believe in the Moon landings know virtually nothing about the alleged missions. What do you do then? Do you trust in your own cognitive abilities, or do you blindly follow authority and pretend as though everything can be explained away?
If your worldview will not allow you to believe what you can see with your own eyes, then the problem, it would appear, is with your worldview. So do you change that worldview, or do you live in denial? The Moon landing lie is unique among the big lies in another way as well: it is a lie that seemingly cannot be maintained indefinitely. Washington need never come clean on, say, the Kennedy assassinations. But the Moon landing hoax, I would think, has to have some ki nd of expiration date.
How many decades can pass, after all, without anyone coming even close to a reenactment before people start to catch on? How about when we hit the year anniversary? If the first trans-Atlantic flight had not been followed up with another one for over forty years, would anyone have found that unusual?
There are indications that this lie does indeed have a shelf life. According to a July 17, post on CNN. A poll by Mary Lynne Dittmar, a space consultant based in Houston, Texas, found that more than a quarter of Americans 18 to 25 expressed some doubt that humans set foot on the moon. There are many doors that can be pried open to achieve that goal, but this one seems particularly vulnerable. Join me then as we take a little trip to the Moon. Or at least pretend to.
In Mein Kampf, he wrote that, "If you're going to tell a lie, make sure it's a really fucking big lie. He went on to explain that this was so because everyone in their everyday lives tells little lies, and so they fully expect others to do so as well.
But most people do not expect anyone to tell a real whopper The kind of lie that is so over-the-top that no one would dare utter it if it was in fact a lie. That is the type of lie, according to Hitler, that will fool the great masses of people, even when the lie is so transparently thin that it couldn't possibly stand up to any kind of critical analysis by anyone actually exercising their brain rather than just blindly accepting the legitimacy of the information they are fed.
Take, for example, the rather fanciful notion that the United States landed men on the Moon in the late 's and early 's. That's the kind of lie we're talking about here: the kind that seems to defy logic and reason and yet has become ingrained in the national psyche to such an extent that it passes for historical fact.
Before proceeding any further, I should probably mention here that, until relatively recently, if I had heard anyone putting forth the obviously drug-addled notion that the Moon landings were faked, I would have been among the first to offer said person a ride down to the grip store. While conducting research into various other topics, however, it has become increasingly apparent that there are almost always a few morsels of truth in any 'conspiracy theory,' no matter how outlandish that theory may initially appear to be, and so despite my initial skepticism, I was compelled to take a closer look at the Apollo program.
The first thing that I discovered was that the Soviet Union, right up until the time that we allegedly landed the first Apollo spacecraft on the Moon, was solidly kicking our ass in the space race. The Soviets launched the first orbiting satellite, sent the first animal into space, sent the first man into space, performed the first space walk, sent the first three-man crew into space, was the first nation to have two spacecraft in orbit simultaneously, performed the first unmanned docking maneuver in space, and landed the first unmanned probe on the Moon.
Everything the U. The smart money was clearly on the Soviets to make it to the Moon first, if anyone was to do so. Their astronauts had logged five times as many hours in space as had ours.
And they had a considerable amount of time, money, scientific talent and, perhaps most of all, national pride riding on that goal. And yet, amazingly enough, despite the incredibly long odds, the underdog Americans made it first. And not only did we make it first, but after a full forty years, the Soviets apparently still haven't quite figured out how we did it. Could it be that they were just really poor losers?
What should we do? Ivan: Let's just shit-can our entire space program. Boris: But comrade, we are so close to success! And we have so much invested in the effort! Ivan: Fuck it! If we can't be first, we aren't going at all. The moon has so much to teach us, and the Americans will surely not share with us the knowledge they have gained. Ivan: Nyet! In truth, the entire space program has largely been, from its inception, little more than an elaborate cover for the research, development and deployment of space-based weaponry and surveillance systems.
The media never talk about such things, of course, but government documents make clear that the goals being pursued through space research are largely military in nature. For this reason alone, it is inconceivable that the Soviets would not have followed the Americans onto the Moon for the sake of their own national defense. It is not just the Soviets, of course, who have never made it to the Moon.
Nor has any other industrialized nation, despite the rather obvious fact that every such nation on the planet now possesses technology that is light-years beyond what was available to NASA scientists in the s. Some readers will recall that and younger readers might want to cover their eyes here, because the information to follow is quite shocking , in the s, a full complement of home electronics consisted of a fuzzy, channel, black-and-white television set with a rotary tuning dial, rabbit ears and no remote.
Such cutting-edge technology as the pocket calculator was still five years away from hitting the consumer market. It is perfectly obvious, of course, that it was not consumer electronics that allegedly sent men to the Moon.
The point here though is that advances in aerospace technology mirror advances in consumer technology, and just as there has been revolutionary change in entertainment and communications technology, so too has aerospace technology advanced by light-years in the last four decades. So if they could pull it off back then, then just about anyone should be able to do it now.
Why then, I wonder, have we not returned to the Moon since the last Apollo flight? Following the alleged landings, there was considerable talk of establishing a space station on the Moon, and of possibly even colonizing Earth's satellite.
Yet all such talk was quickly dropped and soon forgotten and for nearly four decades now not a single human has been to the Moon. Again, the question that immediately comes to mind is: Why? Why has no nation ever duplicated, or even attempted to duplicate, this miraculous feat? Why has no other nation even sent a manned spacecraft to orbit the Moon? Why has no other nation ever attempted to send a manned spacecraft anywhere beyond low-Earth orbit?
If so, then could it reasonably be argued that it would be possible to make six random landings on the surface of the Earth and come away with a complete and thorough understanding of this heavenly body? And is there no military advantage to be gained by sending men to the Moon? But the s were not a particularly prosperous time in U. And yet in the four decades since then, we are apparently supposed to believe that no other nation has been able to afford to do it even once.
NASA has recently announced that we will not be returning, as previously advertised, by the year That means that we will pass the fifty-year anniversary of the first alleged landing without a sequel. Will that be enough elapsed time that people will begin to wonder? What about after a full century has passed by? Will our history books still talk about the Moon landings? And if so, what will people make of such stories? When they watch old preserved films from the s, how will they reconcile the laughably primitive technology of the era with the notion that NASA sent men to the Moon?
Since the last Apollo flight allegedly returned from the Moon in , the furthest that any astronaut from any country has traveled from the surface of the Earth is about miles. And very few have even gone that far. The primary components of the current U. The total distance traveled during the alleged missions, including Earth and Moon orbits, ranged from , miles for Apollo 13 to 1,, mi les for Apollo All on a single tank of gas.
To briefly recap then, in the twenty-first century, utilizing the most cutting-edge modern technology, the best manned spaceship the U. But in the s, we built a half-dozen of them that flew almost 1, times further into space. And then flew back. And they were able to do that despite the fact that the Saturn V rockets that powered the Apollo flights weighed in at a paltry 3, tons, about. To put that into more Earthly terms, U. The Apollo astronauts, on the other hand, traveled a distance equivalent to circumnavigating the planet around the equator nine- and-a-half times!
And they did it with roughly the same amount of fuel that it now takes to make that mile journey, which is why I want NASA to build my next car for me. I figure ITl only have to fill up the tank once and it should last me for the rest of my life.
They have, for example, all of that film footage shot on the moon and beamed live directly into our television sets. More than two decades later, we would have trouble broadcasting live footage from the deserts of the Middle East, but in , we could beam that shit back from the Moon with nary a technical glitch! According to the agency, all the tapes were lost back in the late s. All cartons of them. In all, some boxes of transmissions from the Apollo lunar missions are missing.
Would not an irreplaceable national treasure such as that be very carefully inventoried and locked away in a secure film vault? And would not copies have been made, and would not those copies also be securely tucked away somewhere? Come to think of it, would not multiple copies have been made for study by the scientific and academic communities?
Had NASA claimed that a. Perhaps some careless NASA employee, for eliaiiille. Or maybe some home porn. But does it really seem at all credible to claim that the entire collection of tapes has gone missing - all cartons of them, the entire film record of the alleged Moon landings?
But you would be mistaken. The tmth is that the original footage has never been aired, anytime or anywhere - and now, since the tapes seem to have conveniently gone missing, it quite obviously never will be. The fact that the tapes are missing and according to NASA, have been for over three decades , amazingly enough, was not even the most compelling information that the Reuters article had to offer. To the contrary, it was footage shot off a television monitor, and a tiny black-and-white monitor at that.
That monitor may have been running live footage, I suppose, but it seems far more likely that it was running taped footage. As I have already noted, the s were a decidedly low-tech era, and NASA appears to have taken a very low- tech approach. As Moon landing skeptics have duly noted, if the broadcast tapes are played back at roughly twice their normal running speed, the astronauts appear to move about in ways entirely consistent with the way ordinary humans move about right here on planet Earth.
Here then is the formula for creating Moonwalk footage: take original footage of guys in ridiculous costumes moving around awkwardly right here on our home planet, broadcast it over a tiny, low-resolution television monitor at about half speed, and then re-film it with a camera focused on that screen. But not, it should be noted, too unnatural.
And what guy, given the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to spend some time in a reduced gravity environment. Or how far he can jump?
Hitting a golf ball! Who the hell wants to see that? How about tossing a football for a yard touchdown pass? Or how about the boys dazzling the viewing audience with some otherworldly acrobatics?
Am I the only one, by the way, who finds it odd that people would move in slow motion on the Moon? Why would a reduced gravitational pull cause everything to move much more slowly?
Was slow motion the only thing NASA could come up with to give the video footage an otherworldly feel? Also allegedly beamed back from the Moon was voice data, biomedical monitoring data, and telemetry data to monitor the location and mechanical functioning of the spaceship. And for the lunar rovers. And for the entire multi-sectioned Saturn V rockets. There is, therefore, no way for the modern scientific community to determine whether all of that fancy s technology was even close to being functional or whether it was all for show.
Nor is there any way to review the physical record, so to speak, of the alleged flights. And we will never, it would appear, see the original, first-generation video footage. You would think that someone at NASA would have thought to preserve such things. How did they get those? As it turns out, authentic Moon rocks are available right here on Earth, in the form of lunar meteorites. Because the Moon lacks a protective atmosphere, you see, it gets smacked around quite a bit, which is why it is heavily cratered.
And when things smash into it to form those craters, lots of bits and pieces of the Moon fly off into space. Some of them end up right here on Earth. By far the best place to find them is in Antarctica, where they are most plentiful and, due to the terrain, relatively easy to find and well preserved.
And that is why it is curious that Antarctica just happens to be where a team of Apollo scientists led by Wernher von Braun ventured off to in the summer of , two years before Apollo 11 blasted off. You would think that, what with the demanding task of perfecting the hugely complex Saturn V rockets, von Braun and his cronies at NASA would have had their hands full, but apparently there was something even more important for them to do down in Antarctica.
NASA has never offered much of an explanation for the curiously timed expedition. Some skeptics have said that it is possible that Moon rocks could have been gathered from the Moon with robotic probes. There is no indication that it can even be done today. Some of them apparently bear no resemblance at all to lunar meteorites. Instead, they look an awful lot like twtrified wood from the Arizona desert.
It is also possible that they are of otherworldly origin but not from the Moon at all - such as meteorites from other sources that have been collected here on Earth. The other problem, it turns out, is that most of the Moon rocks are, uhmm, missing.
Does anyone see a pattern developing here? Of rocks from the Apollo 17 mission given away to nations or their leaders, only about 25 have been located by CollectSpace.
The outlook for tracking the estimated Apollo 11 rocks is even bleaker. The locations of fewer than a dozen are known. How do you account for that? For at least two decades now, since the launch of the Hubble Space Telescope, we have been promised dazzling images of the lunar modules sitting on the surface of the Moon.
The Hubble technology, needless to say, never managed to deliver. And seven years later, the fabled images have yet to materialize. In March of , Space. NASA carried out six piloted landings on the Moon in the time period through Fringe theorists have said Who knew, by the way, that the European Space Agency had the technology and the budget to send a spacecraft off to orbit the Moon? Who knew that the Europeans even had a space agency?
I would think that it should be fairly easy to send some guys to at least orbit the Moon I mean, all they have to do is add a couple seats to the spacecraft design that they already have and they should be ready to go. Indeed, the images are fantastic and so is the focus. The images, however, hardly live up to the billing. They are, in fact, completely worthless. Even if we give NASA every benefit of the doubt and assume that the images have not been amateurishly Photoshopped and that the indiscernible white dots are indeed something of man-made origin, the most likely culprit would be those Soviet robotic probes mentioned by Space.
A number of those probes, which were part of the Apollo-era Luna Program, were very similar in size and shape to the lunar modules - certainly enough so that images of much higher resolution would be required to make a definitive judgment. Actually, after studying the image above, of one of the alleged Luna probes. As the story goes, the astronauts on Apollo 11, Apollo 14, and Apollo 15 all allegedly left small laser targets sitting on the lunar terrain one of them can be seen in the official NASA photo reproduced below , so that scientists back home could then bounce lasers off the targets to precisely gauge the distance from the Earth to the Moon.
It is perfectly obvious though that the targets, if there, could have been placed robotically - most likely by the Soviets. It is also possible that there are no laser targets on the Moon. In December , National Geographic reported that scientists at MIT had been achieving essentially the same result for four years by bouncing a laser off the surface of the Moon. The New York Times added that the Soviets had been doing the same thing since at least Xhere was much about the Apollo flights that was truly miraculous, but arguably the greatest technological achievement was the design of the lunar modules.
Has anyone, by the way, ever really taken a good look at one of those contraptions? I mean a detailed, up-close look? While what is depicted in the images may initially appear, to the untrained eye, to be some kind of mock-up that someone cobbled together in their backyard to make fun of NASA, I can assure you that it is actually an extremely high-tech manned spacecraft capable of landing on the surface of the Moon.
And incredibly enough, it was also capable of blasting off from the Moon and flying 69 miles back up into lunar orbit! Though not immediately apparent, it is actually a two-stage craft, the lower half the part that looks like a tubular aluminum framework covered with Mylar and old Christmas wrapping paper being the descent stage, and the upper half the part that looks as though it was cobbled together from old air conditioning ductwork and is primarily held together, as can be seen in the close- up, with zippers and gold tape being the ascent stage.
It also, of course, possessed sophisticated enough navigational capabilities for it to locate, literally out in the middle of fucking nowhere, the command module that it had to dock with in order to get the astronauts safely back to Earth.
It also had to catch that command module, which was orbiting the Moon at a leisurely 4, miles per hour. I think we can all agree for now that such a sleek, stylish, well- designed craft would have no problem flying with that kind of power, precision and stability. There is one thing that appears to be a problem though: how did they get everything on board the modules that they were going to need to successfully complete their missions?
According to NASA, the modules were excluding the landing pads only about twelve feet in diameter. First of all, of course, we have to account for the space taken up by the various components of the ship itself. And then, needless to say, there is the power supply - or rather multiple power supplies. For the descent stage, there is the reverse-thrust rocket that allegedly allowed the craft to make a soft landing on the Moon. And then for the ascent stage, there is a powerful rocket to propel the random bundle of sheet metal into lunar orbit.
There are also additional rockets to allegedly stabilize the vessel in flight the random clusters of what look like bicycle horns. Next we have to include everything required to keep ourselves alive and well. Or will we just unfold cots on the lunar surface? Was Neil Armstrong, unbeknownst to the American people, the first man to take a dump on lunar soil? Or was it Buzz Aldrin? Which astronaut has the distinction of being the first to soil the lunar landscape?
Anyway, getting back to our packing list, in addition to a sanitation system, it is imperative that we bring along an adequate supply of food, water and oxygen - and not just enough to last for the planned duration of our visit, but enough to supply a small safety cushion should anything go wrong. Because from what I have heard, running out of food, water or oxygen while on the Moon can really fuck up an otherwise perfectly good trip.
We are also going to need to install a top-of-the-line heating and cooling system. Probably several of them, actually. So now we have to add all of the following to our already crowded spacecraft: ourselves; a minimal amount of room to sleep and otherwise take care of the basic necessities of life; some type of plumbing and sewage system; a really good heating and cooling system, and a considerable supply of food, water and oxygen.
Now we have to add all of the equipment that will be required to maintain the ship and complete our planned missions. First of all, we are definitely going to need to pack an exhaustive supply of spare parts and a wide variety of tools.
That is an absolute must. From what I have heard, there are a few stores on the Moon that do stock spaceship parts, but they tend to close on certain days of the week. There are a lot of things that can go wrong with our spaceship and the only thing harder than finding a good mechanic here on Earth is finding one on the Moon.
We still have a couple more items to pack, and we probably should have gotten them on sooner because they are going to require a lot of space.
Since this is one of the later Apollo flights, you see, we also have to pack a dune buggy, otherwise known as a lunar rover. And the rovers, according to NASA, are a full ten feet long, just two feet less than the diameter of our craft. But not to worry - according to NASA, the rovers pictured below folded up to the size of a large suitcase.
When released, they would just sort of magically unfold and snap into place, ready to roam the lunar terrain. There is no real compelling reason to take it to the Moon And as can be seen below, it should easily fit into our spaceship. Lots and lots of batteries. Especially of the really big batteries that run the ship. If we had folding Moon buggies back in the early s, then how far behind could folding automobiles have been had we chosen to stay the course?
But as with all the Apollo technology, it existed only in that specific period of time and has now, sadly, been lost to the ages. I wonder why they would do that? And in better condition too. Did they pick up the ones they sent to the Moon at a used car lot? Before moving on, I need to emphasize here just how sophisticated the lunar modules actually were.
Conditions on the Moon are, to say the least, a bit different than here on Earth. And the decidedly unearthly temperatures. They have no idea how fast and hard artificial intelligence is going to upend the economy. What use would a car, autonomous or not, be if your dream of an upended economy comes true?
I would rather have enough control over my own life to make a life for myself, regardless of what the economy has done for the rest of the sheep. And the AI crowd has been making that same prediction for fifty years. Artificial Intelligence, six decades of parlour tricks and not much to show for the billions spent. Typical liberal elitism. You do admit that the ultimate goal is to take away the freedom of movement by making it so expensive that only the rich elite will be able to take a drive anywhere they want at anytime that they want to.
Nick, i think you dont get it. Actually I want my own automated car. Not one that has been used for all kinds of disgusting things previously. I tell it to come get me at home and it wakes up from wherever it lives and comes to my house. Then I call it up again when I want to go back. And, at the end of each day it permanently wipes its memory of where it has been.
Except that I would still have a garage for it! It would just be automated, but mine. Not some yukky used piece of public transportation. Self-driving cars are one thing, taxi services are another. Self-driving, individually owned vehicles is where the market is especially with us baby boomers beginning to hit retirement. Own your own vehicle as eyesight may become poor. Still retain your ownership and independence. I agree with you! Not so strange. I have an attached two car garage.
We could keep the autonomous car in there much like I keep our current cars in there. No paranoia here, but yes while uber has been a game changer for some, it is folly to think all will abandon cars. I drive 45 miles to work, one way.
Lets say i decide to hit home depot, grocery store and restaurant on the way home. Where do in-store my purchased tool while I buy groceries. Where do I store tools and groceries while I eat out? And if you have to own a car some ofnthe month for times like this you are going to Get the most out of this car instead of paying some other company to cart you around, at times the rates during rush hour.
Where I live uber can take 15 minutes or more to arrive. What makes you think someone will invest in thousands of autonomous cars to serve the thousands who live just in my neighnorhood?
Not gonna happen. Oh my. So much intolerance and hate! You should seek some sort of publicly-available counseling. Lots of speculation in your justification. We were, by all accounts, supposed to be paying 5 bucks a gallon plus for gas by now outside of the city-states like Chicago, New York, LA, where you already do. And narrow minded, rather like the article author, who assumes we all live in, and want to live in, cramped, crowded apartment structures where on a good day you can smell your neighbors armpits.
Not every one wants to be urbanized. In fact. Gimmeh my car pleeze. Why do liberals always have to add an insult to a comment? Perhaps they have a lack of confidence in their ideas. This lengthy and long-winded answer indicates you have far too much time on your hands. Dem, perhaps? Enjoy a laugh for once: jvhoffmannjr. You have those options now you dope. Uber, taxis, mass transit etc… Yet the number of cars keeps increasing.
How many articles have we already seen saying the problem getting driver less cars is other drivers? I am guessing you are a city dweller. Tough to find a parking space in front of your little condo or apartment then even worse getting a space at work. That being just down the street. There is another world we need you to learn about. A world where there is no bus or train to take you to the nearest store 5 miles from your home.
No train line nor bus going toward where you work in any direction miles from your home. This article is just another example of liberals not being able to conceptualized numbers. Sad shame. Just the coasts and only big city people think like you do. Please, open your own mind. Look past your millenial block and uber ride. I recognize a liberal when I see one.
Many people need vehicles that carry six or more people. Many people need vehicles with either large interior storage or exterior storage. Lots of people have things to tow- boats, trailers, cars, mowers. This sort of scheme works for one narrow demographic. This is more wishful thinking than rational thinking. Leftists have been tying to get people out of cars and suburbs for forty years.
Most of the world is not like NYC. Are you in the automotive business? I am, and have been for almost 30 years. I also remember that by now we should have all been driving SMC plastic or all aluminum vehicles. While there are plastic body parts bumpers and Ford uses an aluminum alloy on their trucks, the overwhelmingly majority of cars are still made out of steel. But, go hang your hat on the assumptions in this article. Mostly in high density urban areas.
Not everyone is a supercilious nose-ringed urban hipster and part of the reason the general population dislikes people like that, is because they incorrectly assume that the entire population shares their opinions and priorities. Personally I have used a personal gas-driven vehicle for much of my life but at other times used public transportation for years at a time, so I am not ideological about this, both modes have pluses and minuses.
But I am an adult, and just as I prefer to make my own decisions about issues like car ownership, I also grant to other adults the same right. What exactly gives so called progressives the right to lord it over everyone else and make all their decisions for them? A lot of people love cars. Personal cars may be a novelty but I will probably have one that I purchase for cash because certain ones are beautiful.
The Drudge people, BTW, are the adults in the room. It will be chosen for them. Just like taxation is used for. To tax is to control. Agenda Many so called news articles do not allow the comment section anymore. I dare you…watch any of the 4 or 5 so called news outlets, they all have the same talking points.
Limbaugh and Hannity played back to back clips of one news story and the main talking points were verbatim. The problem, most people watch only ONE news outlet and do not switch to see what others are saying. Markets and risk control insurance rates. Not if the Democrats get any power. I agree.. Good example is that both Italy and Germany are taking away empty houses and hotels and rehabbing them and giving them to the new migrants. The cost of car insurance will sky-rocket for those who want autonomous vehicles, once the insurance companies figure out self-driving cars are safer and cause fewer accidents.
The insurance companies wagged the dog on that one and slowly will do the same with autonomous cars. Federal regulations and consumer requirements have more to do with how passenger vehicles are built today, not automotive insurance. Sure, insurance has some influence, but to a much lesser degree. Autonomous cars are death traps.
Sorry but computers are no where near the place they need to be for them to be in control of a car. I have been testing software for 20 years, and there is always a bug someone did find!!!
Even the best and most robust industrial operating systems require a human supervisor in order to avoid catastrophies. The only computer that is hack proof is one that is not attached to any network, intranet, internet, WiFi or any other way it can be reached. It would have to be completely isolated.
Yes but we are discussing hacks here, not EMPs. Of course it is hackable, any computer that is not a closed system, any Computer that exchanges data from outside of itself is hackable. An intranet which no outside source has access to would be a closed system and safe but if anyone can get to a link in the system that too can be hacked. A Satellite is just a wireless connection, so it is hackable. The last time we had a big solar flare hitting the earth was prior to the Civil War, when the only thing we had that was electrical was the telegraph.
Today that sort of flare would fry computers, bring down the electric grid, and slam us back technology-wise to about — without whale oil lamps, steam locomotives, and plenty of horses to ease the shock. It just happened to my home computer last night. Driving and owning a car is not strictly a utilitarian concept as the tech fascists behind these companies seem to believe and cost in only one small component.
These concept have virtually all the problems that public transportation does and the public has rejected it resoundingly as they will this. If you think that self driving cars will be safer you are sadly mistaken. As soon as people start to get killed by self driving cars, the trial lawyers will shut down the industry. They want the revenue. So insurance and accidents will decrease dramatically. And have it tracked. The thing will probably monitor your blood level and refuse to stop at the store so you can get a candy bar LOL.
The Government is now a major propaganda machine. They use the media to test and try to convince us of their social control plans. Ha ha! Remember a few years back when the Segway was going to revolutionize urban transportation? Yeah, right. If it ever became cost prohibitive to own a car, the public would start buying fuel efficient motorcycles in mass like they do in China.
This is looney liberalism on display with their ecofanatism. So in as little as 13 years, Americans will lose all interest mobile independence as adults and will demand to be driven around like small dependent children. These pencil pushing theorists tend to be adult-aged children themselves and seem to be projecting their own infantile delusions than sound theory.
Agreed, this is horse excrement. I love my Jeep, love to go off roading, and will own her for as long as I live. One thing. ALL the car companies are gearing up for this very scenario. They are putting billions into it. The subject consumes every issue of my car magazines. Like it or not? You need to broaden your horizons. And…ironically…I would love this technology. So I no longer drive.. I thought they would laugh at me…but the Medicare Representative…took me seriously and tried to look up an appropriate code!
So I think a portion of their vision will slowly develop…but not in the way they think it will. Their theory leaves out human motivation, which is the chink in their control-based-armor…. Not a fun thing to have to tell them, because they want to be like their peers so badly. Self-driving cars offer mobility to people who lose it otherwise… but the control-freak dream of everyone giving up their cars?
Not going to happen, especially in the USA. Yeah, people are going to share a driver-less car with the local hooker and heroin addicts. Not going to happen. The point is that change can, and does, happen fast and unforeseen. Christ, need to spell everything out for you drudgetarded twats. Automobiles, well someone saw a profit to be made. Did you know that there have been over 1, car manufacturers in the U.
How many appletinis are you up to at this point, Nick? Google and Facebook are both servants of the government and corporations, and they work against the interest of individuals and the general public. They do not serve the public and they have a monopoly on your personal information. That should tell you something about your utopian future with self driving cars for the masses replacing private transportation. Did you hear what the Railroads said to the Airlines? Payphones said it to cell phones also.
I appreciate the artwork and there is nothing quite like a stack of records, you feel like you really own something. Each album has its own story. However, as an audio format, IMO it is junk. Getting part of the way to a self-driving car is relatively easy. But a real self-driving car has to KNOW so many things. What a ball looks like rolling out into a street.
What old people crossing a street looks like and means to a driver. This requires the AI revolution we were promised and have not seen yet. Which means these are empty promises. Same amount of time that it took for the 35mm film camera to go away. Its part of Agenda 21 and Agenda 30 that many have been warning about. We are losing our freedom. What about traveling out of state to visit relatives and children? Look up Georgia guidestones. They are replacing humans with robots.
Did you see the graph? It says around , 7 years from now, that there will be almost no individual car sales. That is ridiculous. But it is the dream of the left so they can further control us. Soon one of these loons will think it is a good idea to put ankle monitors with hearing devices on all citizens. You will be doing mankind a much greater favor by doing that. Wisdom comes with age, if at all, and the youth do not have any, it takes time.
You forget the Car collectors too! Only you can resist and change this, this article is the beginnings of their plan, so resist or succumb to their plan. I am not sure how to stop it. My car is my office, workshop, go van. Do I agree with this BS? Might get some traction no pun intended in major metros. But then, they already have an autonomous fleet there. And yet people still own their own cars in the city. File this one next to underwater cities and global warming, guys.
The flying car is right around the corner!!! I think this is the same person who said cars will drive themselves in 5 years. What is scary is that people with this level of utter and profound stupidity could possibly vote.
I wonder what they studied to make this prediction. Clearly not human nature. I recall a study sometime in the s that predicted that most people would have telephones in their homes you know, the kind wired to the wall that people could see each other on within ten years. Yes, like the 40 yr old dream of everyone owning a flying car, this is total BS. I know how the sausage is made, and I know the cost sensitivity of automotive electronics. Automotive electronics are NOT made to the standards of avionics systems.
The autonomous stuff is a pipe dream, it will never be safe or cheap enough to put on a huge number of vehicles. People like to be free, free to do what they want when they want to. Their desire for automobiles reflects that desire for freedom.
Those loony New Yorkers went from horses to cars in about 13 years, and that was over a century ago. The economics alone make it a no brainer. Add in increased safety, better air quality, mobility for underserved populations blind, elderly, etc , and it becomes a total slam dunk. Nonsense, people will not want to give up their ability to travel freely. While Self driving vehicles may indeed grow in numbers, if they can perfect it to an acceptable safety level, many of those will be privately owned.
The same people who ignore the freedom advantage of personal cars probably also believe that voluntary slavery is becoming popular. That model never caught on either. I do think that in 13 years you will see this taking over in major cities. I absolutely see this happening eventually. The cost of solar vs, coal now is an example. I will own one , because I like to travel wherever and whenever I want. I will also continue to own an older model that cannot be tracked by gps.
But will you be able to drive it legally? Insurance is going to skyrocket once autonomous cars are the norm. If the democrats are running the show, capitol punishment might be the penalty for driving a car. I used to listen, but moved on. Rush, the band, not the radio pundit. Red Barchetta is the song being referred to. You gave me a good chuckle, though.
Kidding me right. My state is a Liberal shit hole. They have stopped all executions. Some families waiting decades for justice. Now being denied by the Democrat Progs. I guess. Stay and fight.
Move to a good State and the Progs that are employed and over taxed leave their shit holes and go to good States. Ruining it for us all. Autonomous cars will not become the norm in our lifetimes. I could take you on a ten-mile aternoon drive here on any day, and point out a half-dozen different situations which such a car could not handle. The lane closure utility tree trimming.
Be gone in a couple of hours, pal , detours just temporary. Truck stalled. Besides, hackers would have a field day. You better have an old microwave in the back seat to throw your phone in.
They will be using it to follow you. You will be taxed an electric transportation tax to cover that. Then they will have to add a ton more taxes to replace the gas tax, and on and on and on.
Where are we going to get the money to pay the taxes? Rob out piggy banks of the play money we stuffed in there as kids? The power will be FREE using our new solar and wind powered electric grids! How do these fools earn money??? I had a brief one way discussion with a smart lady who thought it would be swell to pave roads and docks with solar panels.
She blocked me for giving her a feeling of pushback that was annoying. After Trump restores all the coal mining jobs, he will work to revitalize the blacksmith industry????. Horses provided independency and were replaced by much greater independency — the auto. You would have your watches stolen and your pocketbooks taken and your computers etc. Then the robbers would get off and run. We already have these vehicles available in the form of taxis limos uber buses etc.
Nothing beats having your own car available to go wherever you want whenever you want without having to involve anyone or anything else. That said, I think Transport as a Service and self-driving cars are great for those looking to get work done, the elderly, and even drunk drivers.
But when we did a search for her name on the Internet, the first item was a warning from the New Zealand Ministry of Consumer Affairs about her. Hang on Angelique, what about the hundreds of other Western Australians you have sent the same letter to? Are they also part of the chosen 12? But Angelo da Vinco, who will protect us from scamming fake psychics like you? This appalling letter is trying to scare you into handing over your money. Anna has received some press coverage in England — but all for the wrong reasons.
The press coverage relates to warnings issued by UK authorities about Anna being a psychic scam. But the promise of easy cash comes at a cost. If you think you have seen this unsolicited job offer before, you are right! Only one letter separates this latest money mule scam from the Ascot International Finance Group LLC money mule scam which bombarded our inboxes last month. Ascot International Finance Group LLC is looking for energetic, reliable and honest people to carry out illegal activities.
Chinese speaking scammers are telephoning consumers who come from Asian backgrounds, with the intention of cheating them into sending wire transfers of funds to bank accounts in Hong Kong. The same pitch, the same website and the same scam. Would anyone like to guess the return postal address for this scam? What a cheek! Not if the email is from the Australian International Lottery Program. WA ScamNet normally warns Australian consumers about fraudsters trying to con people out of their money by using the names of UK and Spanish lotteries.
Thanks to Channel 10 for the footage. Never heard of it — nor has Lotterywest and it supposedly shares its Osborne Park head office with this outfit. And the first cheque is ready to be sent now! Award Notification Commission suggests that you are the winner of one million dollars. They even suggest you seek advice from a financial professional on how to spend your windfall. Unfortunately, the only windfall you are likely to receive is a windfall of other similar misleading offers.
Luckily the WA public are too wary to send money to a company in the UK on the basis of a tiny letter that doesn't even tell them what they'd be getting! Or are the scammers behind BIVR so contemptuous of their victims that they believe people will fall for any old nonsense? This time the person on the end of the line is from Baida Group of Hong Kong.
And if you just answer their three question consumer survey you could win an mp4 player! You have just received an urgent email from your bank notifying you of fraudulent activity. If you receive an email call from someone purporting to be from your bank and requesting account and password details, do not respond.
Immediately contact your bank. Do not use the telephone number the email has provided. Dozens of consumers across metropolitan and regional Western Australia have been reporting these unsolicited calls to WA ScamNet in June and July of Unfortunately thousands of dollars have already been lost. The bland email from Barcelo Travel seems innocuous enough, containing only a few short sentences offering a job with a big salary.
But this email is anything but innocent and is flooding inboxes around the world. You will probably receive a different version of this email depending on where you live. Pyramid schemes have been around for a while but WA ScamNet has received recent complaints about a chain letter doing the rounds, which uses the global financial crisis as a way to convince people to take part.
Online shoppers need to be wary of fraudulent store pages operating on Shopify that advertise non-existent goods and falsely promise to donate proceeds to bushfire relief charities and animal rescue groups. Think twice about this one. The email and website say they will realease as few as licences for the software, creating a sense of urgency.
The Blacktacos mail orders sales company is one of the most prolific serial scammers known to WA ScamNet. But you already knew that. We have had reports from customers about the website appliancesdeals. We have had reports about the website www. Tibetan Buddhist monks emphasize spiritual growth over material wealth or gain. So why would a genuine Tibetan monk try to sell you a prayer wheel solely designed to make you a multi-millionaire through games of chance?
Scammers are circulating spam emails purporting to contain links to websites with information on the recent Boston explosions, but in fact contain links to malicious content that may infect and allow scammers remote access to your computer. While the passing of celebrities or other breaking news stories prompt most of us to turn on the TV, search the internet and text or call friends, scammers swing into action to take advantage of our thirst for information.
Getting an expensive piece of jewellery just as a reward for shopping is an incredible offer. Much too incredible! Seeing the recent bushfires is horrifying for most of us and we just want to help somehow.
But unfortunately scammers see it as an opportunity to impersonate charities, or create fake charities. How do you spot a fake website? The reality is they can look really professional and may have copied official logos, high quality images and even stolen an ABN from a real business.
One sign of a fake site can be a recent copyright date but scammers may also put an older copyright date to fool you. Monetary compendium kings Carter, Hammond and Pierce have become so well known as scammers that they are now sending out letters under the initials C. WA ScamNet suggests you are not unique in this instance because the scammers behind this ruse have sent countless unique people across the world the same cheque, with the same false promises.
The mysterious multimillionaire Mr X knows quite a bit about you, according to the C. Mr X is actually an imaginary character created by the infamous Blacktacos, a mail order sales company.
One thing is for sure: if you respond you will receive other misleading letters just like this one. The black-hearted Blacktacos is trying to con you out of your money with the N. Kingston method. This is the genie of all scams. WA consumers are being warned not to become involved in a diamond related pyramid-trading scheme emanating from Canada, which is operating in WA.
Scammers are offering compensation for a car accident in an attempt to obtain personal information from victims. WA ScamNet is warning consumers and businesses to be on the look out for carbon price scams. The CHP letter is all smoke and mirrors. It talks about monies which you are eligible for, not monies you have won. So how does it explain the fact that seventeen other companies are plugging the same scam, use the same terms and conditions, and have similar mailing addresses in Fort Langley, British Columbia, Canada?
The letter looks like an official invoice complete with a stamp, bar code and ID number. But looks can be deceiving. This letter is nothing more than a ploy to get you to spend your hard earned cash on a competition that will not be judged for a year.
This scam is as redundant as its name "Cash-telegram Delivery Service". All you will get is a report detailing free sweepstakes or competitions you might be eligible to enter. A similar scam letter doing the rounds from International Payments Centre also lists the same address. While on social media or using the internet, you may have seen pop-up advertisements for expensive electronics being offered at ridiculously low prices, for example, an iPad for ten dollars.
A WA consumer, who sent off their money to Carter Hammond and Pierce, received a cheap photocopied booklet listing web-based sweepstake and prize giveaways. So, what do you do when someone tells you that you have won a prize in a competition you did not enter? Scammers pretending to be Centrelink staff have potentially fleeced thousands of dollars from Western Australians. He even provides you with a return envelope so you can claim your prize.
But if you read the fine print, using the return envelope waives your right to the cash prize! These days, it pays to be extra vigilant on social media. A fake online questionnaire claiming to be from popular chemists are doing the rounds. People receive a link to the survey, which may even appear to be sent by a friend or family member. Entrancing magic for found again love … Dazzling financial success in every domain … Cosmic protection against harmful influences Power of supreme influence over beings, things and destiny.
There may be other letters peddling similar useless lucky charms and paraphernalia. Columbus-Partners Inc claims to be an online-to-offline money transfer service with headquarters in New York City. It claims there are five openings to assist in creating a virtual local presence. This is an illegal money mule or money transfer scheme which has a very nasty sting in its tail.
An email arrives confirming your order for a lap top computer or other product or service. The email attachment provides further details of your order. Hang on! You click on the attachment to find out more information, fearing that somebody has stolen your credit card information to place the order. Contest America Publishers makes it sound all too easy — answer a simple question and you could win thousands of dollars.
You might be better off trying your luck with Australian Lotto or buying your own puzzle book! The email proclaims it is the "best job opportunity of the month". Ask yourself whether this caring, supportive boss will bail you out of jail when you are arrested for money laundering?
All you will get for your money is a list of sweepstakes you can enter. Countess Maria Romanova has your best interests at heart, or so she would have you believe. A credit card scam can come in many forms. For example, scammers may use spyware or some other scam to obtain your credit card details. A scammer might steal or trick you into telling them your security code the three or four digit code on your card and then make purchases over the internet or the telephone.
Crown Imperial Imports claims to have a large package waiting to be delivered to your door. Crown Imports, also known as Crown Imperial Imports , has been doing the rounds for years.
They claim you are the recipient of one of the major items listed - from big TVs to cash, cameras, computers, and jewellery. But it's all a sham. What you are more likely to receive is some cheap, low quality product such as jewellery or a leather wallet set which will be worth far less than the money you send. The Internet is an increasingly popular way to buy and sell goods. There was a terrifying ring-around-the-rosie as I desperately ran around a table being chased by zombies.
And the piece de resistance: standing in the pitch black of night, hearing moans and gurgles, and lighting my torch only to see a train of nine zombies lurching full-speed at me. It was exhilarating and hilarious at the same time. The dusky, grimy aesthetic of H1Z1 and persistent, player-made changes to the gigantic world are everything you've come to expect from a top-notch zombie apocalypse MMO. It's a game of survival, and the consequences of trying to work with strangers when you're unsure if they're friend or foe.
Comments
Post a Comment